Subject:
|
Re: More LP S P A M : (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 11 Jul 2001 16:28:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
923 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Duane Hess writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Duane Hess writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > > > Then I'm assuming that you've never had sex, or been in a fist-fight.
> > > >
> > > > Why?
> > >
> > > Pornography is just a graphical depiction of sex. Sex happens in real life.
> >
> >
> > It does yes. But not as it is depicted in pornography.
This is a family forum. Like I said before, it may just be that I am a prude.
>
> What is your basis to the claim that acts depicted in pornography are
> different than those done in real life behind closed doors?
>
> >
> > > Violence happens in real life to varying degrees. Get threatened with a
> > > crow-bar, or get maced sometime. I feel that both are pretty violent and
> > > they have both happened to me.
> >
> > You must be mixing with the wrong people.
>
> The crow-bar incident stemmed from my attempt to help a woman in a
> neighboring apartment who was being abused. The abuser, didn't like my
> involvement.
>
> The macing incident resulted from my inability to back down from a
> confrontation. The crowd I was associating with had nothing to do with it.
>
> > Violence in the movies is not the
> > same as in real life.
>
> How so? What is different?
Just what war torn coutry do you live in?
>
> > Perhaps the US's fascination with gun culture would be
> > lessened if the movies depicted the full horror of what they can do - rather
> > than depict the usual band-aid type wounds.
>
> Does this mean that you feel that violence should not be censored? It seems
> like you are suggesting that movie violence (gun violence in particular)
> actually be made *more* graphic to communicate more effectively the damage
> resulting from a gunshot wound.
Not more violent, but more realistic. There is a clear distinction between
the two. Movies have the stylised violence we see today as the market does
not want to see the real thing. Films which show real violence (Nil by Mouth
comes to mind) do not make huge $$, because the market wants, to a certain
extent, escapism – not reality.
Scott A
>
> >
> > Scott A
>
>
> -Duane
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
189 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
