Subject:
|
Re: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 10 Jul 2001 23:27:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3753 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Brown writes:
> >
> > That is *exactly* what we are doing when we say the lion is amoral. We are
> > saying that our morals do not apply to it.
>
> Uh, no, by the definitions you gave (and my understanding also) amoral does
> not specifically relate to _our_ (human) morals, but _any_ morals.
Yes, you're right. My imprecision. What I meant was: "We are saying that
morals do not apply to it."
Mea culpa, mea culpa.
James
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
244 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
