To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 11560
11559  |  11561
Subject: 
Re: Survey methodology relating to latest LP SPAM
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:18:29 GMT
Viewed: 
653 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
When did the polling take place?
What group was polled – age/sex/ethnic background?
What order were the questioned asked in?
Was any supplemental information given?
How was the poll undertaken - telephone / face-to-face/via the web?
Were any other questions asked?
Who are the “polling experts at the University of Connecticut” – and was
their comment related to the poll?

http://www.freedomforum.org/publications/first/sofa/2001/sofa2001.pdf

(methodology section)

Sorry, I did not see it when I read over the webpage the other day. None the
less, I think that telephone surveys are not as good as the real thing.
However, this is a moot point.


is all the info I have. Seems like your fairly standard telephone survey,
and they are not claiming huge accuracy, just the fairly typical (for this
sample size) 95 confidence +/- 3% (for the entire group) results.

Since this is a newspaper sponsored group, you'd think they have some
familiarity with how to do these surveys...  Their methodology seems very
similar to that used by Gallup/Roper et al, with likely similarity in accuracy.

As for your rebadging of the subject line, Scott... typical.

Hardly typical. Even if it was, it appears that I am not the only one who
thought your post "spam".

But it is typical of you to delete the parts of my posts you don't like...

Scott A


++Lar



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Survey methodology relating to latest LP SPAM
 
Would you two just take it offline and shut the hell up? How many times are people going to have to tell you that your endless sniping at each other is the most annoying thing in this group before you shut up, play nice, and ignore each other? (...) (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Survey methodology
 
(...) (URL) section) is all the info I have. Seems like your fairly standard telephone survey, and they are not claiming huge accuracy, just the fairly typical (for this sample size) 95 confidence +/- 3% (for the entire group) results. Since this is (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

189 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR