Subject:
|
Re: More LP S P A M : (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 10 Jul 2001 01:27:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1704 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Duane Hess writes:
>
> > I've been through the public education system (several of them actually) and
> > I think the government is doing a lousy job at it. The quality of student is
> > degrading rather quickly.
>
> I ask this as a flat question, without intentionally hidden rhetoric: Is
> there another country of comparable size, population, and demographic and
> financial diversity that has a predominant and demonstrably successful
> privatized educational system? That is, has a non-public system been shown
> as better across the board among a similarly diverse student base, or are we
> simply taking the small sampling of private US schools and extrapolating
> what we feel their results might be when applied to the nation as a whole?
> We're all great drum-beaters when it comes to ridiculing the US public
> educational system, but is there really another nation we might use as a
> comparison? Again, I'm just asking, because I don't know.
I don't know of any large developed nation with a predominantly private
secondary education system. I can think of one that has a predominantly private
health care system though, which might be analogous as a basic and essential
service required by the whole population.
--DaveL
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
189 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
