 | | Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon
|
|
(...) You're apparently in the minority. When watching the show, I was able to (through my own knowledge) discount all the alleged "mistakes" they made except for: 1. the Van Allen radiation belts 2. the overlaid photography from different sites 3. (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon
|
|
(...) <snippage> (...) "Documentary" indeed. :^P ~Grand Admiral Muffin Head (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon
|
|
(...) Oops, that's my fault for watching channel 5, I should have known better, there renown for pumping out rubbish (rubbish made in America). Well, I've read the site and my faith in the Moon landing's has been restored. Steve (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon
|
|
(...) Quote from the site mentioned above: "Good ... and of course, no one claims they did. Thousands of pictures were taken on the Moon, and the ones you see will tend to be the good ones. If Buzz Aldrin accidentally cut off Neil Armstrong's head, (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
