To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 11534
    Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon —Steve Lane
   (...) Haven't you seen that documentary? The one that shows all the errors made when they faked the landing. It was so faked. I'm surprised I'm not more bothered. The video's show the flags flapping with the wind (there's supposadly an outdoor (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
   
        Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon —David Eaton
   (...) You're apparently in the minority. When watching the show, I was able to (through my own knowledge) discount all the alleged "mistakes" they made except for: 1. the Van Allen radiation belts 2. the overlaid photography from different sites 3. (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
   
        Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon —Mark Sandlin
     (...) <snippage> (...) "Documentary" indeed. :^P ~Grand Admiral Muffin Head (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
   
        Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon —Steve Lane
     (...) Oops, that's my fault for watching channel 5, I should have known better, there renown for pumping out rubbish (rubbish made in America). Well, I've read the site and my faith in the Moon landing's has been restored. Steve (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
   
        Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon —Bruce Schlickbernd
   (...) Quote from the site mentioned above: "Good ... and of course, no one claims they did. Thousands of pictures were taken on the Moon, and the ones you see will tend to be the good ones. If Buzz Aldrin accidentally cut off Neil Armstrong's head, (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR