 | | Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon —Kirby Warden
|
| | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> (...) Ummm...why what? (23 years ago, 8-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Why ask about conspiracy theories? (23 years ago, 8-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon —Kirby Warden
|
| | | | (...) why not? aren't they debatable? (23 years ago, 8-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Well, sure! And that's a perfectly valid reason in and of itself, wasn't challenging that. Just wondering if you had something deeper in mind with the question, is all. (Some convertor used this question as an opener to try to convince me of (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon —Kirby Warden
|
| | | | Nope, I don't do the converting thing. If someone doesn't agree with me on a topic, it doesn't disturb me in the least. However, I do enjoy being challenged, wheather I challenge myself, or find myself challenged by another force (people, (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon —Rick Clark
|
| | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Kirby Warden writes (in part): (...) I'll come out on this one. I love the film, Capricorn One [1]. I believe the hoax theory is plausible [2], and I even doubted the veracity of the moon landing for a few days a couple (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon —Kirby Warden
|
| | | | | heh, I enjoyed watching "capricorn one". I hope no one is taking this thread as direct challenge. Though I am a believer in the moon landings, I understand that it is possible (though unlikely) that I could have been led astray. (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Anniversary of a hoax? (was Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon) —Steve Chapple
|
| | | | (...) I had never questioned it before some friends pointed out the problems - now I'm leaning more to the skeptic side. I see the biggest problem being the radiation. Could you point me to your "anomaly refutation" site? At the moment the only (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Anniversary of a hoax? (was Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon) —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) Chances are the anomalies you refer to are the ones pointed out in the Fox special awhile back-- I think they covered most of the bases, including the Van Allen radiation belts-- This link covered it pretty well, along with some pointers to (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Anniversary of a hoax? (was Re: Conspiracy theories: men on the moon) —Steve Chapple
|
| | | | (...) SRC L#765 (URL) (23 years ago, 9-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
