To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 11352
11351  |  11353
Subject: 
Re: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 3 Jul 2001 15:29:31 GMT
Viewed: 
1111 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
Ah, so all morality is conceited? If not, please clarify.

Actually, I would have thought you agreed with this point.

I wasn't actually saying I do or don't-- I was just asking to try and probe
Scott a little further. Socratic method, I guess... I'm not really exploring
and/or defending my own standpoint with Scott yet-- I'm trying to figure out
where he stands. If I can, great, if not, oh well. But I guess what I'm
saying is that everything here is actually a question, geared to force a
decision in one direction or another. I'm not actually advocating either
direction. At least not yet.

DaveE



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?
 
(...) I'm not sure what infering our morals on them really means, but I do agree that we are anthropocentric in our judgement of other critters. But I'm not sure a) that this is a bad thing, or b) that it is possible to get away from. How would we (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

244 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR