 | | Suddenly Chris makes it personal (was: Nothing personal, but...) —Dave Schuler
| | | | (...) You're creating a false dichotomy; by forcing Shiri to assert a hard line of distinction--knowing that such a hard line is by its nature impossible--you are attempting to say that no distinction can exist between "too much," "too little," and (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Suddenly Chris makes it personal (was: Nothing personal, but...) —Christopher L. Weeks
| | | | | (...) (And (...) I can see what you're saying, but that wasn't my intent. I would be satisfied to discuss the results of her (or your) attempt to codify (even with the understanding that the edges are hazy) what "too much," "too little," and (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Suddenly Chris makes it personal (was: Nothing personal, but...) —Tom Stangl
| | | | | (...) And in the meantime everyone ELSE has to put up with your child being a brat? You disgust me. You're one of the people that lets their children run rampant over everyone else, letting them "learn", and then "discuss" it with them afterwards. (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Suddenly Chris makes it personal (was: Nothing personal, but...) —Christopher L. Weeks
| | | | | (...) to (...) time. (...) If he had been so severe that I thought the other children needed their rights protected, I would have done so. In the instance that I'm thinking of, that wasn't the case. He wasn't bein egregiously abusive, he just wasn't (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
