Subject:
|
Re: Terms and Conditions Question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 1 Jun 1999 22:13:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
902 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, 12 May 1999 21:59:16 GMT, James Brown uttered the following
profundities...
> Why are sex and walking different? Conceptually, at least. I am aware that
> there are one or two technical differences. ;)
>
> > The whole point of walking is to get from A to B - whether A and B are
> > the same place and the person has gone via C doesn't matter.
>
> But a person who walks (regardless of A, B, or C) solely because they enjoy
> walking is not accomplishing the intended purpose of walking. Again: Does
> that make them ill?
>
> > > ill people want to get well they just don't know it"
> > You said it not me, ask any person who is ill whether they want to
>
>
>
Does the argument change at all, if someone is walking from
A to B, with the intent of engaging in sex upon reaching B?
--
_____________________________________________________________
richard.dee@nospam.virgin.net remove nospam.(lugnet excepted)
Web Site: http://freespace.virgin.net/richard.dee/lego.html
ICQ 13177071 AOL Instant Messenger: RJD88888
_____________________________________________________________
For the best Lego news, visit: http://www.lugnet.com/news/
Need instructions for a model? http://www.kl.net/scans/
_____________________________________________________________
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Terms and Conditions Question
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Simon Denscombe writes: "The whole natural point of having sex is reproduction or the possibility of it (contraception isn't 100% safe) - with homosexuals this is impossible." --> Copied from your post. Please stop (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
150 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
