| |
In lugnet.off-topic.test, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> What Katie had to say was a complete non-sequiter to what I had to say - it
> didn't relate, I couldn't tell what her real point was through the sarcasm,
> she effectively misquoted me, and seemed to be under the impression that I
> am recruiting for the Libertarian Party (as I'm sure Chris Weeks and Larry
> P. will point out, I'm not a Libertarian). All I got was a sense of
> hostility and I really am not sure why. Since she has chosen not to respond
> to my follow-up message to her, I can only presume that she likes that
> boulder sitting there.
As I see it, her response (and she can CMIIAW!) was basically a rant triggered
by issues you raised. You just happened to be the one to set it off. I
recognize it because at one time or another I have agreed with everything
she wrote-- okay, maybe not everything-- I LIKE Martha Stewart! :-) But I
don't think she meant it as a formal rebuttal to what you specifically said,
and I think it is useless to respond to what she wrote point by point as at
least one person has tried to do.
BTW time and age do make it a bit easier to shoulder the boulder...
Maggie C.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: boulders on shoulders
|
| (...) What Katie had to say was a complete non-sequiter to what I had to say - it didn't relate, I couldn't tell what her real point was through the sarcasm, she effectively misquoted me, and seemed to be under the impression that I am recruiting (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
