To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 10947
10946  |  10948
Subject: 
Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 15 Jun 2001 20:56:35 GMT
Viewed: 
2666 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Shiri Dori writes:
> > <snipping>
> > 
> > (BTW, before I start, SCLC was the movement originally led by Martin Luther
> > King, Jr. - the Southern Christian Leadership Conference.)
> 
> Thanks - I just never connect the initials to the group.  :-)

No problem. I wouldn't know myself, if I hadn't just ended a year with an
excellent U.S History class. :-) My teachers, both this year and last, were
really amazing and I doubt I will forget what I learned any time soon.

> It's a pretty good analogy that isn't quite right.  Libertarians tend to be
> white, male, and middle-to-upper-middle class.  That isn't rich.  Shouldn't
> the rich be Libertarians if your analysis is correct?
> 
> But they aren't, so you have to wonder why - the rich *do want* government
> for primarily the same reason as the poor (to protect their interests).  For
> example, why do the poor need an expensive military?  They don't: the rich
> need it to protect their overseas investments.  The rich and poor both want
> government, but to different ends.  Middle, and especially upper-middle
> class, don't need the social supports that the poor want, nor the power
> supports the rich need.  White males need the civil rights support the
> least.  And there we have the Libertarian Party: white, male, middle to
> upper-middle class, the least in need of government.

Hmmm. Very good point.

But I bet Bill Gates ain't happy with the U.S. government nowadays. ;-) And
he's rich. ;-)

-Shiri



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
 
(...) True dat... but we are trying very hard to establish that not everyone currently unhappy with the U.S. government is necessarily libertarian and you ain't helping. :-) ++Lar (25 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
 
(...) Thanks - I just never connect the initials to the group. :-) (...) It's a pretty good analogy that isn't quite right. Libertarians tend to be white, male, and middle-to-upper-middle class. That isn't rich. Shouldn't the rich be Libertarians if (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

271 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR