Subject:
|
Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 15 Jun 2001 15:01:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1302 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> >
> > >
> > > Answer my points Larry - if you can.
> >
> >
> > Let's start with an very very easy one:
> >
> > From: http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=10891
> > =+=
> > Larry:
> > > It was, at least for the 20+ fests, meetings, events,
> > > etc., I've attended in 6 countries on 3 continents... (a slightly better
> > > sample set than yours) For the subset that I reviewed pictures, each one of
> > > them was more male than 49% and more white than the population average for
> > > the continent or the country or the state that it was held in.
> >
> > Scott:
> > This is all noise, BUT where did you get the averages from?
>
> Not going to play this game any more, sorry. I've justified my assertion
> that LUGNET members are more white and more male than the averages to my
> satisfaction,
Like I say Larry, you are full of opinion which you just cannot justify. All
I am asking for, on this one, is a simple reference – but you are simply
unable to mange it.
> and surely to the satisfaction of any reasonable person.
>
> If it's not to *your* satisfaction, tough.
...another insult - how adult.
>
> Is there anyone else here challenging that assertion? I don't think so.
I think it is a fair question Larry. One which it should be quite easy for
you to answer. I just do not understand why you are unable to do so?
> However feel free to start asking why the sky is blue if you like.
It is rather grey here today.
>
> It was a throwaway assertion anyway, meant merely to illustrate the point
> that it is fallacious to draw conclusions based solely on ethnicity.
In *some* circumstances I would agree 100%
> The
> other participants have already accepted the validity of that fallaciousness.
Really? I think not.
Scott A
>
> ++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
| (...) Oh, I'm able, all right. I could just go to the UN site or wherever and quote demographics. I'm just unwilling to continue to spar with you about the assertion that LUGNET is demographically more white and more male than the norm because it's (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
| (...) Not going to play this game any more, sorry. I've justified my assertion that LUGNET members are more white and more male than the averages to my satisfaction, and surely to the satisfaction of any reasonable person. If it's not to *your* (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
271 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
