Subject:
|
Re: Rolling Blackouts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 18 May 2001 12:57:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
990 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> As the text I quoted states, the market can not be trusted to look after the
> environment. Are you really saying you think it can?
The text you quoted *claims* it cannot. It is an assertion by that author,
not a fact, that it is impossible to do so. That is not a view I share.
The point of this subthread is to explore further, with concrete ideas and
proposals, whether it can or cannot, not merely to assert it cannot. If you
just want to say it can't, we heard you already, and your time may be better
utilised elsewhere.
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Rolling Blackouts
|
| (...) Did I say it was as fact? (...) What a surprise. Can you justify this? (...) Not even if it cannot? (...) If you just want to say it can, we heard you already. But perhaps you can take the time to justify your view. But before you do, take a (...) (24 years ago, 18-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Rolling Blackouts
|
| (...) The market will *not* provide that... read the text I quoted. Consumers are too focussed on the low price of oil and the Big Macs. (...) As the text I quoted states, the market can not be trusted to look after the environment. Are you really (...) (24 years ago, 18-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
246 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
