Subject:
|
Re: Rolling Blackouts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 17 May 2001 15:37:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
885 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
>
> > In environmental terms, what is
> > the cost of cheap oil?
>
> SUVs! Hopefully, we are once again going to see evolution-in-action on them
> with high gas prices. :-)
Watch it. I don't want another dull evolution debate to start again.
After I typed by above text this morning, I found this interesting item by
Paul Krugman. It is a little dated now, but it is still very relavant to
this debate. Two key passages:
"...every economics textbook I know of has argued that the government should
intervene in the market to discourage activities that damage the environment."
"These days, however, the main problem comes from the right--from
conservatives who, unlike most economists, really do think that the free
market is always right--to such an extent that they refuse to believe even
the most overwhelming scientific evidence if it seems to suggest a
justification for government action."
The whole item can be read here:
http://slate.msn.com/Dismal/97-04-17/Dismal.asp
Scott A
>
> Bruce
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Rolling Blackouts
|
| (...) quoted this passage instead. "True, economists generally believe that a system of free markets is a pretty efficient way to run an economy, as long as the prices are right--as long, in particular, as people pay the true social cost of their (...) (24 years ago, 17-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
246 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
