To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 10386
10385  |  10387
Subject: 
Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 10 May 2001 19:59:10 GMT
Viewed: 
833 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
Dave Schuler wrote:
Of course the court of public opinion is the most powerfull court. When
big bad corporation X screws over someone, the public will react. If the
corporation is bad enough, the public will start to shun the
corporation, and if it's the only corporation making some product,
someone will realize pretty quickly that there's a guaranteed market for
a competing product.

  This assumes, too, that Joe Smith TWD Group hasn't already established a
monopoly under which no guaranteed market exists, except for Joe Smith's
products.  Further, they will no doubt be able to afford the most capable
spin teams and PR firms, so they'll *still* manage to make themselves seem
the most attractive option.

Well, the biggest such organization today is.... The United States
Federal Government....

Think about it, what makes the government any different than Joe Smith
TWD? Actually, there's a really big difference, they've done such a good
PR job that we agree that they are the only effective "regulatory"
oversight group.

  So you're agreeing that a corporation will not only be just as corrupt,
but will likewise take steps to make sure that its corruption is beyond the
reach of individual correction?
  The difference is that the government can be sued, and the government has
the finances to reimburse appropriate damages, and the government is not the
largest offender re: illegal toxic dumping (to continue the example).
  I'm not saying, for that matter, that the government is perfect, nor am I
preaching bigger-is-better government.  I'm saying that it would be no
better if such organizations were privatized, and I'm very confident that it
would quickly get worse.

     Dave!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
 
I think you have a few nots missing, and a few added where they do not belong (...) c /can/cannot/ in many cases. Nor can government employees. (Libertopian corporations would have no such immunity for their personnel) (...) That is, has the power (...) (23 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
 
(...) Well, the biggest such organization today is.... The United States Federal Government.... Think about it, what makes the government any different than Joe Smith TWD? Actually, there's a really big difference, they've done such a good PR job (...) (23 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

246 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR