To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 1033
1032  |  1034
Subject: 
Re: New Web Page
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 25 May 1999 06:27:05 GMT
Viewed: 
2483 times
  
Steve Bliss wrote:

> On Mon, 24 May 1999 08:02:36 GMT, legoverse@geocities.com (Terry K) wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 23 May 1999 10:30:05 GMT, Mr L F Braun <braunli1@pilot.msu.edu> wrote:
> > 
> > >   I'm looking forward to the Sacajawea dollar.  At least it doesn't look
> > > like a quarter.  It's gold, like a Pound!
> > 
> > It might be pretty to look at, but I think it is a waste.  Sure, the coins will
> > "last longer, thus reducing printing costs associated with bills".   But who
> > really wants to carry around big, heavy dollar coins?  And it will probably be
> > big - size was supposedly one of the failings of the Susan B. dollar.  Too much
> > like a quarter.
> 
> Augh!  Quoting from <http://www.usmint.gov/dollarcoin/coinspecs.cfm>
> 
> > The new dollar coin will be golden in color, not silver toned. It will also
> > have a "distinctive edge," which means that it will not display the reeded
> > edge as seen on the quarter or the Susan B. Anthony dollar coin. However,
> > it will be the same size as the Susan B. Anthony dollar coin, which is 26.5
> > mm in diameter.
> 
> Why couldn't they have gone with a 27 or 28mm diameter?  That would have
> been enough to differentiate the two coins!
> 
> At least it won't have the same 'reeded' edge as a quarter!  Hopefully, the
> thickness and weight will be different from the quarter.  Although those
> didn't help the SBA dollar.

   Augh!  is right!  Oh, that's just plain idiotic.  The only rationale I can see is
that they don't want to have to retool all of the old coin-op machines in the post
office and public transit around the country (provided it will be about the same
mass).  If it's the same size, no problem--but it'll end up "quarterized" too.

   This just sucks.

   LFB.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: New Web Page
 
(...) Augh! Quoting from (URL) (...) Why couldn't they have gone with a 27 or 28mm diameter? That would have been enough to differentiate the two coins! At least it won't have the same 'reeded' edge as a quarter! Hopefully, the thickness and weight (...) (27 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR