To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 1033
1032  |  1034
Subject: 
Re: New Web Page
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 25 May 1999 06:27:05 GMT
Viewed: 
855 times
  
Steve Bliss wrote:

On Mon, 24 May 1999 08:02:36 GMT, legoverse@geocities.com (Terry K) wrote:

On Sun, 23 May 1999 10:30:05 GMT, Mr L F Braun <braunli1@pilot.msu.edu> wrote:

  I'm looking forward to the Sacajawea dollar.  At least it doesn't look
like a quarter.  It's gold, like a Pound!

It might be pretty to look at, but I think it is a waste.  Sure, the coins will
"last longer, thus reducing printing costs associated with bills".   But who
really wants to carry around big, heavy dollar coins?  And it will probably be
big - size was supposedly one of the failings of the Susan B. dollar.  Too much
like a quarter.

Augh!  Quoting from <http://www.usmint.gov/dollarcoin/coinspecs.cfm>

The new dollar coin will be golden in color, not silver toned. It will also
have a "distinctive edge," which means that it will not display the reeded
edge as seen on the quarter or the Susan B. Anthony dollar coin. However,
it will be the same size as the Susan B. Anthony dollar coin, which is 26.5
mm in diameter.

Why couldn't they have gone with a 27 or 28mm diameter?  That would have
been enough to differentiate the two coins!

At least it won't have the same 'reeded' edge as a quarter!  Hopefully, the
thickness and weight will be different from the quarter.  Although those
didn't help the SBA dollar.

   Augh!  is right!  Oh, that's just plain idiotic.  The only rationale I can see is
that they don't want to have to retool all of the old coin-op machines in the post
office and public transit around the country (provided it will be about the same
mass).  If it's the same size, no problem--but it'll end up "quarterized" too.

   This just sucks.

   LFB.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: New Web Page
 
(...) Augh! Quoting from (URL) (...) Why couldn't they have gone with a 27 or 28mm diameter? That would have been enough to differentiate the two coins! At least it won't have the same 'reeded' edge as a quarter! Hopefully, the thickness and weight (...) (25 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR