Subject:
|
Re: New Web Page
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 24 May 1999 23:27:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
862 times
|
| |
|
|
Mike Stanley wrote:
> Christopher L. Weeks <c576653@cclabs.missouri.edu> wrote:
> > Mike Stanley wrote:
> > It's also a non-issue because it's a felony to cross state lines with
> > your weapon. At least that's how I understand it.
>
> Really? I will have to look that up now. If for no other reason than
> curiosity.
>
> I'm not sure I'm ready to accept that I can only exercise my 2nd
> ammendment rights within the confines of my own state.
My father explained it thus, many moons ago: If you're going to be carrying
firearms from one state into another, you have to obtain a license from all the
states involved--wherever you'll be carrying the firearm. If the target area
(pun unintended) doesn't allow concealed weapons, you can't have a concealed
weapon--it's up to the authorities of the place where you'll be. It's onerous,
but not an infringement of the right itself--it's just a few more ducks to get
in a row. Call the Florida state police, I'm sure they'll give you the scoop.
The Ohio cops were really nice about it, but that was 1982 or so.
I think LEOs (even off-duty) and people with Federal permits can carry
firearms across state lines without notification, though.
LFB.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New Web Page
|
| (...) Really? I will have to look that up now. If for no other reason than curiosity. I'm not sure I'm ready to accept that I can only exercise my 2nd ammendment rights within the confines of my own state. (25 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
