Subject:
|
Re: A question of remembrance...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 7 May 2001 13:44:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1586 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
> Unfortunately, those who gain power by being in
> control of a centralized military have convinced most of the US to
> accept that a "professional" military (and police) is necessary, and
> that common citizens can't be trusted with weapons.
I know many people who shouldn't be trusted with weapons, and most of them
aren't police. However, you've hit on an important point, regarding both
the necessity of a professional military and the difficulty of reducing it.
No one with a stake in national sovereignty (ie: everyone) wants to disband
the standing protective force against external incursions. No one, in
short, wants to be the first to throw down his military, because there's no
way to ensure that one's opponent won't immediately take advantage.
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A question of remembrance...
|
| (...) The people who least want to see a reduction in the military are those who make the weapons. Take a look how much the companies who will work on Son of Star Wars gave Dubya for his election. Scott A (24 years ago, 7-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A question of remembrance...
|
| (...) Oh, now thats a solution. By that generalization, I belive almost NO ONE in the world has any right to live where they live. I doubt ANY population in the world can be documented to be living on land they didn't take from someone else (and in (...) (24 years ago, 7-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
197 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
