 | | Re: A question of remembrance... —Scott Arthur
|
| | | (...) Is that the thing where Israel have shot dead a bunch of kids, bombed homes and carried out assasinations? How does that show the PLO is "far worse"? Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: A question of remembrance... —Daniel Jassim
|
| | | | | (...) And we're still waiting to hear his explanation for that statement. While were waiting: (URL) (24 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: A question of remembrance... —Daniel Jassim
|
| | | | (...) And we're still waiting to hear his explanation for that statement. While we're waiting: (URL) (24 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A question of remembrance... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Don't hold your breath. I don't respond to every distortion Scott slings, or even very many of them, actually. (...) by my characterisation of the PLO as far worse. ++Lar (24 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A question of remembrance... —Daniel Jassim
|
| | | | | (...) Well, that's just dandy though it doesn't stand to reason why you'd take the side of the oppressor? If that's your attitude, I can only say that I strongly feel you are choosing to fill your head with the garbage the mainstream media would (...) (24 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: A question of remembrance... —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | (...) I suppoose that reflects your biased standpoint. If found it rather depressing. I am sure sites are out there which can show the "other side" which would be just as bad. (...) Don't be too hard on Larry on this - he can't help being (...) (24 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: A question of remembrance... —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) I suppoose that reflects your biased standpoint. I found it rather depressing. I am sure sites are out there which can show the "other side" which would be just as bad. (...) Don't be too hard on Larry on this - he can't help being (...) (24 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: A question of remembrance... —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | | | (...) As I see, you can be quite reasonable when it is for your advantage, right?..:-) Selçuk (24 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: A question of remembrance... —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) I am always reasonable. Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: A question of remembrance... —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | | | (...) Knowing yourself is nice, but better to leave this to other readers..:-) Selçuk (24 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A question of remembrance... —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) No distortion Larry. Just facts. Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
