Subject:
|
Re: A question of remembrance...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 1 May 2001 07:52:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2389 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Selçuk Göre writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Selçuk Göre writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > > You appear to view human rights a luxury which is great if it can be
> > > > afforded economically. I view them as being rather more fundamental than
> > > > that. As I said before, Turkey will not get in the EU until it gets itself
> > > > in order.
> > > >
> > > > Scott A
> > >
> > > You are completely clueless again. I neither said nor mean anything like
> > > that. All I tried to explain is was you are not defending human rights, you
> > > are just musterbating. Continue, though. It is quite relieving I believe.
> >
> > I believe I understand the differnce between defending human rights & and
> > masterbation.
>
>
> I still didn't get this impression, though.
Then perhaps it is you who does not understand the difference
>
> > > And for the EU issue read again (you really seem to be not understanding
> > > anything at the first time):
> > >
> > > "And believe me, if your dearest country and its allies see it as a
> > > profitable thing, whether there is a Kurdish/Cyprus/Agean Sea/whatever
> > > you call problem exist or not, we will be part of your very dear union,
> > > and believe me, you won't have any ways to "vote" about it. Not that I
> > > believe putting us inside EU is profitable from any of the participant
> > > countries right now."
> >
> > You are quite wrong.
>
>
> So, seeing that you tend to prefer simple two-three word answers instead of
> making a point, could you able to explain two simple questions as How and Why?
Turkey would have to bring its legislation in line with the EU. I read a
poll yesterday in the Guardian which said Turkey was the nation which was
least likely to join. Further only around 15% of the EU puplic wnat it to join.
The on-line version may be read here:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4177720,00.html
> Especially, when and if EU politicians decide to put us inside (I don't think
> they would do, but not for not respecting human rights and such, which are just
> minor nitpicks without any real value in international politics) how can you
> make it otherwise? Do you go to the streets marching and shouting with big
> signs on hand? And someone care? Or someone care more than making your police
> beating you with a bat on your head?
Read the text from the Guardian : Turkey is not wanted.
>
> Don't even try to explain how kind and gentle your police are. I already read
> your country's page from AI site.
Ah, but the police in my country go to jail when it can be shown, in court,
they have broken the law.
Scott A
>
> Selçuk
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A question of remembrance...
|
| (...) Don't need to read it I already know it. So, could you please reread my post and several other previous ones? I ALREADY said that Turkey is not wanted. I already said that I BELIEVE PUTTING TURKEY IN IS NOT GOOD FOR ANY EUROPEAN COUNTRY RIGHT (...) (25 years ago, 3-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A question of remembrance...
|
| (...) I still didn't get this impression, though. (...) So, seeing that you tend to prefer simple two-three word answers instead of making a point, could you able to explain two simple questions as How and Why? Especially, when and if EU politicians (...) (25 years ago, 30-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
197 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
