 | | Re: Quick Poll - Kyoto
|
|
(...) Probably. Apologies for the glib answers here -- I'm more interested in the logic behind them. (...) Worst case scenario -- global catastrophe. Even if Greenhouse _itself_ isn't catastrophic, it might be in combination with other ecological (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God have a name for God?
|
|
(...) As soon as the discussion loses its LEGO nature, go to off-topic I think. (...) Or at least the three main narrative threads in the Pentateuch have three different names for God, that reflect different understandings of God. Does rendering the (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God have a name for God?
|
|
(...) Well of course God existed first, that truth is tattooed on our arms at birth. That is after all how we know absolutely for certain. (...) If that were true why don't we all look alike? (...) If God is really a God why is it that he can only (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS")
|
|
(...) looks (...) God, (...) But thats *human* religions!! What if God has It's own religion? What does It call Its Grand Overseer?? ROSCO (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Quick Poll - Kyoto
|
|
(...) That's the wrong question, because it begs the answer. I would suggest that a different line of questioning may be more fruitful. - Is the specific problem that Kyoto purports to solve really a problem? If so, how bad? If we're not sure, what (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Keeping things in perspective
|
|
(...) You bring up some very good points that are pertinent to some Lego/Life things that I've been musing on. I may be alone in this, but I do sometimes feel that the bricks own me...I just *have* to get such and such a set to top off my (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Offtopic .. outgassing
|
|
(...) What is the singular of Legos then? ;-) Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Offtopic .. outgassing
|
|
(...) Gah! My mistake, wrong James! We've achieved critical James-mass, just like we exceeded the Eric limit! Dave! (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Offtopic .. outgassing
|
|
(...) I thought you wrote that there was no such thing as "a LEGO," unless you're indicating that the company's half-life is 2.5B. 8^) Dave! (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Offtopic .. outgassing
|
|
(...) 2.5 billion years. james (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
