|
|
 | | Re: Todd and Eric's attitude (was Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings)
|
| (...) Guys, take it off-line, please. James (24 years ago, 19-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Todd and Eric's attitude (was Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings)
|
| (...) You are obviously correct, of course; I didn't remember that incident. (...) Again, I never said I thought you were 13. Please stop indicating that I did. (...) Well, it wasn't meant as one. There is nothing wrong with being young and not (...) (24 years ago, 19-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Todd and Eric's attitude (was Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings)
|
| (...) Ah, that is where you are mistaken. Here, (URL) that may jog your memory. If I am a 13-year-old, then I was 7 hen i had a son - now that would have been something. You can not judge somebody by words they use, I think Scott Chambers put it (...) (24 years ago, 19-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!!
|
| Hi, I'll go to Tom first and Bill second. (...) Not in terms of breathing, but in terms of heat dissipation, it's better an issue now when something can theoretically be done about it. If cleaner plants mean higher energy costs, IMHO the best (...) (24 years ago, 19-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Todd and Eric's attitude (was Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings)
|
| (...) The tone and vocabulary of every post you make. As you said elsewhere, that's the only evidence I have of anything about you, and it strongly indicated to me that you were not an adult. Which, BTW, is not an insult. Beleive it or not, there (...) (24 years ago, 19-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
