|
|
 | | Re: Why not Both?
|
| (...) copyright, but I'll try to summarize as best possible. Statement: Christianity is unique Rebuttal: No quarrel yet. It is unique. But so is Buddhism. Uniqueness does not imply correctness. S: Its claim of necessity is grounded on strong (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: I've said enough...
|
| (...) Evolution. All "macro-evolution" is is a great accumulation of changes over a great deal of time. That's it! The process isn't any different. Since you acknowledge the process happens, all that needs to be established is geologic time (and (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Why not Both?
|
| (...) rhetoric (ie: propaganda), this page states in essence that Christianity (the religion that worships Christ) is the greatest religion because it worships Christ. Dave! (25 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Why not Both?
|
| (...) I still don't really see it as any more divisive than had I said "branch" or something... I was simply going down the narrower path. The Bible is common to Judaism (at least the Old Testament), Christianity, and I think also Islam, even though (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Probability: (Was: Re: Chaotic Systems...)
|
| (...) Yea, one place it was a big deal in was Ask Marylyn (sp?) in Parade. There's several ways to analyze it and get to the 2/3 chance. The one I realized yesterday is the simplest (but perhaps not most intuitive) is to realize that by switching, (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
