 | | Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
|
|
"Joakim Olsson" <jocke@arjay.nu> wrote in message news:G2vJIA.B55@lugnet.com... (...) that (...) make (...) want (...) They, overwhelming return pro-UK candidates in local/national/eu elections. (...) really (...) highschool, (...) You are right in (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
|
|
"Scott A" <s.arthur@hw.ac.uk> wrote in message news:G2uFr7.BxA@lugnet.com... (...) you're (...) This should have been "Not a "slag", and not just the USA." (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Israel and the Palestinians ( WasRe: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G2uJ31.KFo@lugnet.com... (...) always (...) Iraq or (...) be (...) state (...) that (...) So the democratically take land from those who have lived there for ~1500 years to give to (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: When is a website "independent" and when is it "part of"?
|
|
(...) Well, you are probably right. I do not have all of the facts. Do you have all the facts regarding middle-east? Have they been able to vote about theese issues lately in NI? I know(read it in history books) in the past, that they grouped people (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: A little self examination?
|
|
(...) I get it. It was not a good example, it was not since I used "popular" and "respected" interchangeably. But still I think, in some extent, spending large amounts means somehow dedication to me, so being popular by it, is not so bad also. (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
