|
| | Re: Nuke Boston (was Re: Resolved: Tall SUVs should not be...)
|
| (...) Agreed. (...) But lastworditis forces me to say that I feel it is indeed (the effect of too much regulation, too much government promising to make it right and too much big daddyism). :-) ++Lar (24 years ago, 23-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | Re: Nuke Boston (was Re: Resolved: Tall SUVs should not be...)
|
| (...) Right you are, sir. It started in .people... but, after all, generals are people too! <GD&R> ++Lar (24 years ago, 23-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | Re: Nuke Boston (was Re: Resolved: Tall SUVs should not be...)
|
| (...) I think you wanted .off-topic.fun, because .general is for LEGO related stuff, and the joke, AFAICT, din't have nuthin' to do with LEGO. (...) Uhh, uhh, you have to swallow a 2x4 brick and write a 500 word essay on why installing the (...) (24 years ago, 22-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | Re: Nuke Boston (was Re: Resolved: Tall SUVs should not be...)
|
| (...) (Back to .general again? It was never there that Im aware.) I sent a copy to .general since that was the best group I could find to share Franks great nuke joke. I figured that any follow up would be to the same .off-topic.debate group (...) (24 years ago, 22-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
| | | | Re: Nuke Boston (was Re: Resolved: Tall SUVs should not be...)
|
| Boy, I may not subscribe to off.topic.debate anymore, but you have to love the Subject line! : ) Larry, in all of his wisdom, shines through again. I like my SUV at it's present height, BTW, I think most of these posts should be centered on poor (...) (24 years ago, 22-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |