 | | Re: Standardized tests (was: Yummy!)
|
|
(...) better (...) to (...) Good call. These large multiple choice exams - the ones that the article and I are debating - are not meant as measures for individual classes. By the time I was in high school a decade after you, machine-graded tests had (...) (24 years ago, 7-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Standardized tests (was: Yummy!)
|
|
(...) Whew. That was a long post. Thoroughly enjoyable reading, it's always a joy to see a well written refutation that skewers something point by point. You have more patience than I do, I never could have stuck with that tripe all the way to the (...) (24 years ago, 7-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Standardized tests (was: Yummy!)
|
|
(...) As a side comment just on this part of your reply, Chris (I can't speak to the rest): I was interested by the fact that you referred to the standardised mutiple choice tests as "traditional tests". When I was in high school in the UK in the (...) (24 years ago, 7-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Standardized test again (was:re: tell me why...)
|
|
Well, I hope you can read this, Chris! -Shiri (...) (24 years ago, 7-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.test, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Standardized tests (was: Yummy!)
|
|
Sorry for the length of this folks, I so rarely get to use my Masters of Education ;-) (...) I think that whether one agrees or disagrees depends largely on what they think they are agreeing to. That page says a fair many things that are correct as (...) (24 years ago, 7-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
