|
|
 | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) Ok. My bad. Last time. Change that back to "wouldn't." (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) err..typo: make that "would." (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) I'd say that calling anyone a nazi is pretty strong language that should be used with care and restraint. By calling someone a nazi, you are accusing them of possessing the same moral character as a group that practiced the worst systematic (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| Ed, (...) Well, Ed, since i don't know the particulars on this one, why don't you inform us of it? I do remember something along the lines of congress people now being under the same laws oas we, the citizens, are. If he did not pay his taxes, he (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Wench as a word
|
| (...) Some find me very interesting, thank you. (...) man (...) him (...) and (...) How do you iron a sure? :') Qualifications: One would definitely be that you have to pay your taxes. (...) James happens to be one of the few Democrats that (...) Of (...) (25 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
