|
|
 | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?
|
| (...) well, I was only considering the arena of ideas... (...) Objectivity is usually taken to mean "independent of the observer." Since it's impossible to NOT be an observer of the universe, therefore, objectivity is impossible, goes the argument. (...) (25 years ago, 13-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Mormon bashing again
|
| (...) No, no, no, no. The "H" stands for "Howard". Reference the Lord's Prayer: "Our Father, who art in heaven, Howard be thy name." (-; John (...) (25 years ago, 13-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?
|
| (...) Who's John Galt? <ducks> ;) --Karim (25 years ago, 13-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Pope Apologies for occasional squiffiness of Catholic Church
|
| (...) Yeah - reading on from some of those links, you start to see all the things he hasn't apologised for (collusion with Hitler (oops, I've lost), etc). Although it's a good move away from the self-righteous-can't...o-no-wrong feeling I've always (...) (25 years ago, 13-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?
|
| Typically, when a person says "don't take this personally" it means that there is indeed something there that might be taken personally, and when a person says "no offense" they are about to say something offensive. Sproat gave you some good advice. (...) (25 years ago, 13-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
