|
|
 | | Re: illogical behavior ;)
|
| (...) Did you have to use "Bob"? It's not THAT common of a name, is it?... ;-) (17 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: illogical behavior ;)
|
| (...) huh?? The analogy was as close to apt as I had the time to make--Eric (being Bob) had committed transgressions on LUGNET in the past for which he was 'officially' forgiven. Now smomeone maliciosly attacked Eric, and people have chimed in (...) (17 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: illogical behavior ;)
|
| (...) Dave, Your analogy is incorrect. It would be correct if Bob had done something in another town and then someone in the town hall had abused Bob for his actions in the other town, Bob had defended himself, James had said Bob was reformed and (...) (17 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) Fair enough. JOHN (17 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) No it isn't, but it IS what makes me think he is still among the populus that reads Lugnet. And that is what you asked, isn't it? ROSCO (17 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
