|
|
 | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?
|
| You're probably not the only ones that feel that way, you just seem more vehement about it. You make a lot of good points, and I've since taken the pics down off my own web server. On the subject of legality and ethics, my daily job involves making (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?
|
| (...) YES! YES! Exactly! --Todd (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
| | | | | But it happened
|
| The sad thing is, friendships are gonna be strained to breaking point with this 2000 catalogue thing, its gonna keep going back and forth with decent, non cuss included debate (I'd hate to see the email thats flying about) the populace is gonna (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?
|
| (...) Nope, it just seems that way sometimes at 4:30am. (...) Because you care, not that caring is bad, and not that you care too much. It's just that caring also means getting hurt sometimes too. It's a human thing. But unless I have my timezones (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?
|
| (...) No. But I suspect you're the only ones that feel this strongly. I've stated (somewhere) that I honestly don't think it (the scans being out there) makes a difference, BUT that doesn't make it right. Bottom line: Those retailer catalogues are (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
|
