 | | Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
|
|
(...) Yes. Joke. No smiley because I try not to laugh at my own jokes, as that's usually considered poor form. (26 years ago, 8-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
|
|
(...) I trust this is what is called a Joke? Because I don't think this should be necessary at all. Sarah sarah@eskimo.com (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Special Boxes
|
|
(...) I do like option "c." Even better if it was timer set......... ___...___ richard.dee@nospam.virgin.net remove nospam dot Web Sight: (URL) Instant Messenger: RJD88888 ICQ 13177071 ___...___ (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
|
|
(...) So you're not saying that they couldn't have nailed us, you're just saying that they could have only nailed missile silos. I guess you'd consider any number of nuclear explosions over missile silos and the damage that would cause to the (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
|
|
Matt Marshall wrote in message ... (...) Missile (...) caused (...) 1)The Russians first wave was targeted at the Silos not at the prez because he would be long gone and they knew that 2)They had to fly a really long way, except from the Siberian (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
|
|
They could have and if they got lucky it might have detonated over a Missile Silo(1). But there is now way that had we gone to war they would have caused us a whole lot of damage. There technology wasn't up to it. Not to mention they couldn't get (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
|
|
(...) So are you the person that suggests the the USSR (rememeber that's what it was during the Cold War, or the CCCP if you prefer) couldn't have succeeded in launching an ICBM at us? (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
|
|
(...) But you probably should start your subject with "WARNING EVIL CLONES!!!" every time. (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
|
|
(...) probably lugnet.build is the most appropriate usually -- depending on if you're talking about properties of the bricks or about the companies themselves, you might want lugnet.build or lugnet.general... --Todd (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-"Leading Brand"s here?
|
|
Perhaps a Princess.... wrote in message <3621e044.4881529@20...63.236>... (...) I'm telling you, I will convince everyone that the Russians could never have hurt us at any time during the Cold War even had they tried too.;-> There is no such thing (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
