|
|
 | | Re: Gotta love Oracle...
|
| (...) To answer this question you first have to answer two related and subordinate questions: Is the function that this facility carries out itself constitutional? If not, then requiring ID or not is a moot question since the facility SHOULD be (...) (24 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Gotta love Oracle...
|
| (...) Did you want me to dig up a price sheet for OS/370 circa 1976? It wasn't free. It cost more than you or I make. UNIX System V wasn't free. BSD was never free (California taxpayers and DARPA paid for it) Or did you mean PC operating systems? (...) (24 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Gotta love Oracle...
|
| (...) Is it, therefore, unconstitutional that the government require ID checks prior to allowing admission into CDC labs, for instance? These are government property, ie: public property, are they not? Dave! (24 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Libertarian comes through for the Terrorists
|
| (...) She has written a Second piece for the Guardian. Again the text is strongly worded, but well written. Before anyone reads it, what do these nations have in common: China (1945-46, 1950-53), Korea (1950-53), Guatemala (1954, 1967-69), Indonesia (...) (24 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Gotta love Oracle...
|
| (...) Thank you. (...) There is no market incentive to do so, though, given the regulatory shield. (...) Intent notwithstanding, this nevertheless tends to be the outcome. (...) You're starting in the middle. The company would never be allowed (by (...) (24 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
