 | | Re: Larry's behaviour
|
|
(...) That's not what I asked. I *KNOW* you think he should apoligaise. I *KNOW* why *YOU'RE* doing it. You're way too proud to bother giving it up. You're addicted to the idea that you'll win. But that's not what I asked. I asked why is it better (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Larry?
|
|
(...) our civil law enforcement system, even if we are certain that they have violated the rights of thousands of innocent civilians, until they have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt to be guilty. These are merely suspects. If the (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Larry?
|
|
I figure Larry will have something to say about this, but it's interesting reguardless: (URL) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: train track prservation
|
|
(...) That's an issue with your reading comprehension, not the message. (...) When someone catches you in a lie, pointing it out is "bickering", apparently. That's another lie. This "bickering" characterisation is the same lie you used to try to (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-01, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Future of Humanity (was: lotsa stuff)
|
|
(...) Lets not bring athrax etc into this :) (...) This is an interesting point. It is a generaisation, but in the UK low income families tend to have more kids than higher earners. Many couples (married or otherwsie) decide to have only one or no (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
