|
|
 | | Re: Is this sexism?
|
| (...) I understood your point perfectly the first time. My concern is the attitude about staying pregnant. I think if a woman has to face loss of pay and possible loss of her job if she chooses to have a child then our society has some serious moral (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Is this sexism?
|
| (...) Still her choice - travel to a different state (I'm mainly talking the US here, obviously). (...) STILL HER CHOICE - she chose that religion, or chooses to stay in it. (...) When have I said they deserve more for not having kids? I'm for (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Is this sexism?
|
| (...) Two questions-- 1st off, what if the woman can't abort? What if it's either against the law in her state/country, or it's against her religion or something? But that presupposes the *real* question at hand, that I think I posted elsewhere but (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Is this sexism?
|
| (...) You obviously haven't read the rest of the thread, where I state that choosing to BECOME pregnant isn't really the issue anyways. Choosing to STAY pregnant is (and I think that choice is solely up to the woman). (...) Sure, give them the time (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Is this sexism?
|
| (...) But isn't that a grey area, Tom? How do you prove if it was a choice or not to get pregnant, yet alone a choice or not to even have sex? I think it would be hard to prove and/or a waste of time and money even trying. I say give women the time (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
