To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *10572 (-5)
  Re: A Jeffers factoid or two
 
(...) Our paper had an editorial yesterday which lambasted Jeffers for doing this. The author felt that it was important for the Rebublican party to have liberals and the Democratic party to have conservatives, to the point that independants weaken (...) (24 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: M6 Crash
 
(...) OOPS! :-) (24 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: A Jeffers factoid or two
 
(...) That should read "This is the most for any state, absolutely or proportionately". Sorry! ++Lar (24 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: M6 Crash
 
(...) c /mourning/morning/ unless you *intended* that freudian slip, in which case, good one! Grin. (24 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Rolling Blackouts
 
(...) Explain the tragedy of the commons? Your cite referenced it, I assumed you are familiar with it. (...) Explain the notion that a person engaged in stealing is not a free marketeer? Seems obvious to me. Maybe you're not as familiar with (...) (24 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR