 | | Re: MegaBloks announces Mobile Suit Gundam License —Dave Schuler
|
| | | (...) Criticisms like yours are delightful because they show clearly that you don't know what you're talking about. First, Mega Bloks beat LEGO in the race for articulated mech-like sets by several years. Exo-Force is very much a johnny-come-lately (...) (18 years ago, 24-Jun-06, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: MegaBloks announces Mobile Suit Gundam License —David Gregory
|
| | | | | (...) If I want to diss Megabloks, then I'm in the exact right place to do it. (The L in LUGNET stands for LEGO.) (18 years ago, 24-Jun-06, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: MegaBloks announces Mobile Suit Gundam License —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | | | | (...) Dave's point is you should be informed before you diss, otherwise you just make yourself look bad. Jeff (18 years ago, 24-Jun-06, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: MegaBloks announces Mobile Suit Gundam License —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) Well, Jeff already hit the nail on the head. Go ahead and diss them. Heck, scream to high heaven about how bad you think they are, for all I care. But the more obviously ill-informed your criticism, the sillier you look in the process. I mean, (...) (18 years ago, 24-Jun-06, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: MegaBloks announces Mobile Suit Gundam License —David Gregory
|
| | | | | | | (...) You know those portions of text that the LUGNET admins have programmed to be inserted into our email addresses when we post? You'll see things like "IHATESPAM" or "+avoidspam+" in part of the poster's email address to help thwart those (...) (18 years ago, 24-Jun-06, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: MegaBloks announces Mobile Suit Gundam License —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Well, I find it annoying, yes. (URL) are some of my thoughts on the subject, in fact. At the end of the day, this is obviously a LEGO-fansite, but it seems childish in a "he-men-women-haters-club" sort of way to attach a little snark in the (...) (18 years ago, 25-Jun-06, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: MegaBloks announces Mobile Suit Gundam License —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | (...) Agreed, but the original post was also sent to several other newsgroups, and FUT to .build.mecha as well. ROSCO (18 years ago, 24-Jun-06, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: MegaBloks announces Mobile Suit Gundam License —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) Fair enough, but it's still in the disser's own interest to know what he's talking about. Dave! (18 years ago, 25-Jun-06, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: MegaBloks announces Mobile Suit Gundam License —Christopher Snead
|
| | | | (...) <snip> (...) I have to at least partially disagree with you here. I remember buying a blok bots set many years ago (yes, long before Exoforce, Titan XP, and Life on Mars). I remember being particularly excited about the joint technology, and (...) (18 years ago, 24-Jun-06, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: MegaBloks announces Mobile Suit Gundam License —Mike Petrucelli
|
| | | | (...) Those very first batch of Blok Bots were pretty bad. However the second generation of Blok Bots was right around the time Mega Bloks had a rather large quality jump. They are still not as good as Lego but they are a lot closer than the early (...) (18 years ago, 25-Jun-06, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| | | | |
