 | | Re: Monolith Dimensions —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Reading the rest of the thread before posting is often a good thing to do. (20 years ago, 23-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Monolith Dimensions —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) That way, the poster would have learned that 2 is a perfect square. By the way, the monolith is 1 x 4 x 9. Dave! FUT off-topic.self-deprecation (20 years ago, 23-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Monolith Dimensions —Richard Parsons
|
| | | | | | (...) ROTFLMAO And for those who haven't read the rest of the thread, the monolith is 1 x 4 x 9. Richard Still baldly going... (20 years ago, 24-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Monolith Dimensions —Adrian Drake
|
| | | | | | (...) Really? I heard it was 1 x 4 x 9. Fancy that. Adrian (20 years ago, 24-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Monolith Dimensions —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) But no one in this thread has pointed out that the monolith is 1x4x9 yet! Or did I miss a post... Dave K (20 years ago, 23-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Monolith Dimensions —David Laswell
|
| | | | (...) Three other people mentioned that when replying to the same post as you. Larry was the second one, so he's correct...in a mildly hypocrytical way. (20 years ago, 23-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | (canceled) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Monolith Dimensions —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) My excuse is that john Gerlach and I were posting our posts at essentially the same time, not that someone posted something (more than a week earlier in your case, Dave) thatI should have read before posting to the thread. So I'll see your (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| | | | |
