 | | Monolith Dimensions
|
| "Dave Schuler" <orrex@excite.com> wrote in message news:HrwFG3.Euu@lugnet.com... (...) Best-Lock is (...) Actually, the monolith is 1x4x9. (21 years ago, 23-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
| | | | | Re: Monolith Dimensions
|
| (...) Reading the rest of the thread before posting is often a good thing to do. (21 years ago, 23-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
| | | | | Re: Monolith Dimensions
|
| (...) That way, the poster would have learned that 2 is a perfect square. By the way, the monolith is 1 x 4 x 9. Dave! FUT off-topic.self-deprecation (21 years ago, 23-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Monolith Dimensions
|
| (...) But no one in this thread has pointed out that the monolith is 1x4x9 yet! Or did I miss a post... Dave K (21 years ago, 23-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
| | | | | Re: Monolith Dimensions
|
| (...) Three other people mentioned that when replying to the same post as you. Larry was the second one, so he's correct...in a mildly hypocrytical way. (21 years ago, 23-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
| | | | | Re: Monolith Dimensions
|
| (...) ROTFLMAO And for those who haven't read the rest of the thread, the monolith is 1 x 4 x 9. Richard Still baldly going... (21 years ago, 24-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Monolith Dimensions
|
| (...) Really? I heard it was 1 x 4 x 9. Fancy that. Adrian (21 years ago, 24-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | (canceled)
|
| | | | | | Re: Monolith Dimensions
|
| (...) My excuse is that john Gerlach and I were posting our posts at essentially the same time, not that someone posted something (more than a week earlier in your case, Dave) thatI should have read before posting to the thread. So I'll see your (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
| |
