 | | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
|
(...) lol, whatever. It is its fitting the bricks are dirty - no matter how they got dirty, or what got them dirty *its fitting they are dirty*. Stop trolling!! Geesh, do you never get tired of this? People like you really make enjoying Lugnet hard (...) (23 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
|
(...) You mean your usual "brand-purist-depart...m-reality" based reply? There's a 99.9% chance that it's printer's ink on those bricks. -- Hop-Frog (23 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
|
(...) Classic, just classic. Mark P (URL) (23 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
|
(...) Yeah, or maybe they just don't care about brand purity! And I, for one, welcome the attitude of our new corporate overlords. I'd like to remind them that as a trusted builder, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their overground (...) (23 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
|
(...) Thanks for sharing! Note that this is a promotion from IBM Canada (given the URL) so maybe they were showing loyalty to a Canadian company and not as worried about IBM US having won a gig with LEGO US ??? Just guessing. (23 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
