 | | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
| (...) Gee, how can I put this politely...I guess I can't! But... You, Mark, are in a newsgroup called "off-topic.clone-brands." Whereas your considered opinions are encouraged, your flat out clone-bashing is not. Now, I'm not the boss of you -- but (...) (23 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
| | | | | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
| (...) lol, whatever. It is its fitting the bricks are dirty - no matter how they got dirty, or what got them dirty *its fitting they are dirty*. Stop trolling!! Geesh, do you never get tired of this? People like you really make enjoying Lugnet hard (...) (23 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
| | | | | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
| (...) You mean your usual "brand-purist-depart...m-reality" based reply? There's a 99.9% chance that it's printer's ink on those bricks. -- Hop-Frog (23 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
| | | | | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
| (...) Classic, just classic. Mark P (URL) (23 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
| | | | | Re: IBM chooses Mega-Blocks over Lego
|
| (...) Yeah, or maybe they just don't care about brand purity! And I, for one, welcome the attitude of our new corporate overlords. I'd like to remind them that as a trusted builder, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their overground (...) (23 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, FTX)
|
|
