|
|
 | | testing 1,2,3...
|
| THere goes another one... couldn't seem to do it from my email account though: always bounced. (17 years ago, 23-Oct-08, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: Slope Brick 1x1
|
| I am totally confused now BTW because I got this E-mail from some John L. in my mailbox: ---...--- Dear Jaco, We are sorry to hear of the difficulties you have been experiencing. I suggest 31 would be appropriate. If you have any more questions feel (...) (17 years ago, 29-Sep-08, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Slope Brick 1x1
|
| Right. So who is to change the name then? Peeron or LDraw? (17 years ago, 29-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Slope Brick 1x1
|
| (...) But if you use the part properly* it's 31 degrees. The 45 slope is named for its face slope rather than its total slope. Tim * And by properly I, of course, mean use a heap of offsetting to make them all line up ;) (17 years ago, 29-Sep-08, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Strange object discovered on Mars!!
|
| (...) I've seen that before! That building might bring into question the oversight/review of the architects who designed it (unless it was totally by accident). The (URL) on that building> (if you type in 'Swastika Building' in the search box) says (...) (17 years ago, 26-Sep-08, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
|
