|
|
 | | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
|
| (...) Okay, I take it now that we have dispensed fantasy and are now dealing with real life situations. Vigilantism isn't ideal, because there isn't a standard-- that, of course, is the beauty of Law. The problem comes when the law fails to bring (...) (18 years ago, 9-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
|
| --snip-- (...) No, that's just reality. It's just that liberal minds take a bit more effort to take it into consideration. (...) Does that mean you support Court by vigilante and death penalty for thievery? Do you really think it's up to the (...) (18 years ago, 9-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
|
| (...) Generally speaking, this is the idea to which I object. Identifying with bad guys is bad. (...) Is Han really bad? Sure, he undermines the laws of an evil empire, but does that make him "bad"? Shouldn't we resist evil (bad)? (...) I can't (...) (18 years ago, 9-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
|
| (...) Which can be a bummer IYAM ;-) (URL) (18 years ago, 8-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: A shot in the dark
|
| (...) snip (...) I still say it's 7!!! :) Dave K (18 years ago, 8-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
