|
|
 | | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
|
| (...) Well, it looks like the same antics to me. (18 years ago, 8-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
|
| (...) And god forbid that anyone gets accused of being anti-Semantic. a (18 years ago, 8-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
|
| (...) But you brought their judgment into question. Semantics here, IMO JOHN (18 years ago, 8-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
|
| (...) Just a point of order, Dave: I didn't include a question in my initial post. Cheers Richie Dulin (18 years ago, 8-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
|
| (...) Not to mention your eloquent gift of good grammar and tongue-in-cheekiness. (...) Well, yeah, that's basically what I meant. (...) And that, my friend, may be one of those "nutshell" differences between a liberal and a conservative. Assuming (...) (18 years ago, 7-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
