 | | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) While I can appreciate you point here, Kelly, I have to say that, based on various comments you've made on lugnet in the past, I wouldn't like to frequent a site where your 'standard of maturity' are applied. This post is a pretty good example (...) (19 years ago, 11-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) It is has been my experience that maturity and age (being an adult) have nothing to do with each-other. Of course, what defines "maturity" is also widely varied, some taking it to be politeness even in the face of rudeness, and others take it (...) (19 years ago, 11-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) Actually, I've found the behavior of some people on "adult" LEGO sites (like Lugnet) to be less mature than the norm on kid-oriented LEGO sites (like BZPower). There have been incidents and member actions on Lugnet that I wouldn't tolerate on (...) (19 years ago, 11-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) I'm not sure that the sites that prompted your ponderings are really AFOL sites. Not a a critism of them, merely a thought that the standards of maturity might not be what you would like to get from an AFOL site Tim (19 years ago, 11-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) extremes start when limits are reached. but where (what) are the limits? Some limits are quite clear and well determined : - topic (that's why this thread on lugnet.off-topic part of the site), - TOS,TOU, - federal, national, international (...) (19 years ago, 11-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
