 | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) Really though John, for standing up for our friend, you are teh awesome too. (...) Again let us pause and wish him luck and good bricks where ever he may be. Let us keep warm the bosom that would warmly embrace him, should he be so inclined to (...) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) Fair enough. JOHN (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) You got it. Well done. (...) That "incident", if you will, in my mind marks the time when he finally gave up on LUGNET, and so any ref to that is a sore spot for me; call it my personal "N word". When e invoked his name, I admit, I lost it. (...) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) No it isn't, but it IS what makes me think he is still among the populus that reads Lugnet. And that is what you asked, isn't it? ROSCO (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: malicious behavior
|
| (...) Past performance is no guarantee of future results. (what you snipped: non sequitur) (20 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
