 | | Re: The Brick Testament - More Teachings of Jesus
|
|
(...) No, they need not be mutually exclusive, but I don't see that that is more than a trivial point to make. I suppose someone could, for instance, be rationally convinced that nautral selection accounts for the diversity of life on Earth because (...) (20 years ago, 22-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Brick Testament - More Teachings of Jesus
|
|
--snip-- (...) I don't know where you got this idea from. There are plenty of ways to test hypotheses about the origins of the universe. The Big Bang hypothesis is pretty much accepted by all scientists to the point that it could almost be (...) (20 years ago, 22-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Brick Testament - More Teachings of Jesus
|
|
(...) Must they be mutually exclusive? (...) How? Via torture? ;-) (...) I'm not sure I even understand what the term "Son of God" means. I do know that it isn't merely a synonym of "Son of Man", "Lamb of God", "Messiah", etc. As for His revelation (...) (20 years ago, 22-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Brick Testament - More Teachings of Jesus
|
|
(...) Well, for me it's the ultimate question. And I believe that the origin of the universe is the ONLY PLACE where science and religion collide and become indistinguishable from each other. (...) Science doesn't just accept a "we don't know." (...) (20 years ago, 22-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | This is a test
|
|
I don't seem to be able to post. Is that true? And, I hope this newsgroup is intended for test messages... (20 years ago, 21-Oct-06, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
