|  |  | Re: Off-topic.clones: I wish TLG would have made this part! 
 | 
 | 
| (...) Actually, I've been reading the whole thread, Dave! Trust me on that, Dave! The fact that the parts were first used in a train creation doesn't mean they are train specific parts to a strict compartmentalist like myself, Dave! (...) Again, (...)   (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Off-topic.clones: I wish TLG would have made this part! 
 | 
 | 
| (...) Well obviously it's because I deleted the part that was relevant to trains before posting it. If you had bothered to read the part I didn't post, it would all be clear to you. My train-related question, since Tony's engrooved bricks first (...)   (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.trains) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Lego Space Survey No. 2 
 | 
 | 
| (...) ... (...) b) 6970 (Classic Space rules!) e) 6987 (Great to supplement Blacktron parts!) (...) a) 1 (I'm on a tight budget, and some money must go to other themes.) (...) e) so fast it'll make your head spin. (I'd build the Beta 1 immediately (...)   (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.space) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Off-topic.clones: I wish TLG would have made this part! 
 | 
 | 
| (...) I'm wondering why this leaked over into .trains... I would say that if there are only 2 bins, "official LEGO(r) parts", and "everything else" these parts belong in the "everything else" bin. But the better solution is a different bin (library) (...)   (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Lego Space Survey No. 2 
 | 
 | 
| LEGO SPACE SURVEY No. 2 ___...___ (I thought it would be fun to make another quiz, this time with space bases) For purposes of this survey, assume that The Lego Company is planning to re-release the following space sets: <set:6970> Beta-1 Command (...)   (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.space) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Off-topic.clones: I wish TLG would have made this part! 
 | 
 | 
| (...) I wonder--since these parts still have the official LEGO logo on the studs, would they even have a place in a clones DB? You've mentioned previously a possible library of dats based on user-modified elements; perhaps Tony's bricks would fit in (...)   (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.trains) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Off-topic.clones: I wish TLG would have made this part! 
 | 
 | 
| (...) Hafner has already modelled them -- you should contact him about using them in the clone elements DB. -- Hop-Frog    (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Off-topic.clones: I wish TLG would have made this part! 
 | 
 | 
| (...) I should have shown the underside of the cover, since it has three studs like a 2x4 plate. The brick in the front left corner is a '2x2 slope 45 inverted' with four grooves and a "stepped" body style. This already appears in the clone library (...)   (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Is the Intifada working? 
 | 
 | 
| It looks like it is: Israel asks US for $10bn to halt recession - Intifada takes its toll on a once-buoyant economy (URL) is interesting about the text is how Sharon is reported to be using Iraq as a lever to get more US tax dollars from Bush Jr. (...)   (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate) 
 | 
 |  | 
|  |  | Re: Off-topic.clones: I wish TLG would have made this part! 
 | 
 | 
| (...) No, if they were clear, they'd make fantastic headlights of 60's style cars. /Tore    (23 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands) 
 |