 | | Re: Brick Testament in Trouble?
|
|
(...) I don't know for sure, but it reads like trash, and looks like trash; it probably is trash. Especially given that we've had Brad J's nod of approval, and Brendan specifically so. This is almost certainly some yahoo speculating from no more (...) (22 years ago, 25-Feb-03, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick Testament in Trouble?
|
|
(...) I'm not sure he actually praised the BT directly (in fact he mentioned that there are people who have a problem with it), but offered support for BPS's *creativity*. He said that TLC trusts its brand to its fans, "even BPS"-- that's not to say (...) (22 years ago, 25-Feb-03, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick Testament in Trouble?
|
|
(...) Even aside from how TLG may pursue the matter, the article reads as so much newsrag hype. The author throws around all these shocking terms and veiled accusations but doesn't even mention the fact, much less the implications, that these are (...) (22 years ago, 25-Feb-03, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick Testament in Trouble?
|
|
(...) That article is scary. I would be very disappointed if it was forced to close down. :-( I just might spend a few evenings saving the entire contents on my hard drive while it's still up. (22 years ago, 25-Feb-03, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick Testament in Trouble?
|
|
Wow, that would be interesting if LEGO was taking a position against the site after Brad J. had made favorable statements about the site at BricksWest. jt (...) (22 years ago, 25-Feb-03, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
