 | | Re: LEGO in Washington Post —Harvey Henkelman
|
| | | Despite LEGO® releasing the new classic and legend sets, I can't help but feel that they are continuing to slip away from their winning formula used from the beginning. The Bionicle stuff is total limitation on one's creativity (at least in my (...) (23 years ago, 20-Aug-01, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LEGO in Washington Post —Dave Johann
|
| | | | (...) Interesting rant Harvey, but I take offense to a couple of things you mention in it. (...) If their formula had continued to be a winning one throughout the '90s, Lego would have continued to use it. I prefer to look at it as 'they held on as (...) (23 years ago, 20-Aug-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LEGO in Washington Post —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | | (...) I appreciate the nod, but I used absolutely no Buy-onicle parts whatsoever in my latest mecha. I used the ball and socket bits from C-3P0, and I used two ball bits that I chopped off the end of those useless throwbot arms. (Egad!) In a related (...) (23 years ago, 20-Aug-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LEGO in Washington Post —Mladen Pejic
|
| | | | | | (...) well (...) "useless throwbot arms" That's exactly what Dave was saying not to do. Why destroy a piece when you can work around it? I didn't have to chop off any pieces from my Bionicle ball-joint arms; I incorporated them into the design. (...) (23 years ago, 20-Aug-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LEGO in Washington Post —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | | | (...) I didn't chop up the regular ball-joint limbs, just the useless Throwbot Throwing arm (the one that fires the disc) If you know how to "work around" those, I'd sure like to see some ideas, because there's no studs or technic holes or nothin'. (...) (23 years ago, 20-Aug-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LEGO in Washington Post —Mladen Pejic
|
| | | | | | | Oh sorry, I didn't know you were referring to that pieces. ;-) Still, I'm a *bit* of a purist, and think that type of stuff is still wrong. (...) (23 years ago, 20-Aug-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LEGO in Washington Post —Dave Johann
|
| | | | | | (...) Don't feel bad, Mark. I do it too. It's the one Lego piece that shouldn't exist, but I believe it gave birth to the part we both love-the Bionicle ball with axlehole. I know you had used this part, that's why I didn't mention it in the first (...) (23 years ago, 20-Aug-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LEGO in Washington Post —Bryce McGlone
|
| | | | | (...) Hey Dave, my Cankerworm uses Bionicle in the neck! (Shameless plug #2!!!) (URL) outta here! Later, Bryce (23 years ago, 21-Aug-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LEGO in Washington Post —Geordan Hankinson
|
| | | | | | (...) More shamless plugs! please! new pics! please! I can't wait till september! -Geordan- (...) (23 years ago, 23-Aug-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LEGO in Washington Post —Dave Johann
|
| | | | | | (...) Sorry, Geordan...I'm the only one who gets to see it early and that's only because I live close by...everyone else has to wait another 2 weeks. I will tell you this much: I got to hear Cankerworm on the phone yesterday. It sounds both mean and (...) (23 years ago, 23-Aug-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LEGO in Washington Post —Bryce McGlone
|
| | | | | | Thanks for the excitment Geordan. I'd like to correct or rather explain something Dave said...(it's below) (...) Here's the deal. Living close by entitles Dave to see the Cankerworm early only so I can beg hime for more parts. I usually say (...) (23 years ago, 24-Aug-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LEGO in Washington Post —Geordan Hankinson
|
| | | | | | snip sigh (...) Sigh... (...) SIGH... the anticipation level is rising... -Geordan- (23 years ago, 24-Aug-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LEGO in Washington Post —Harvey Henkelman
|
| | | | (...) I don't exactly call 'record losses in fiscal year 2000' a profit. I'll be frank here, LEGO® has to dumb down their new sets and make them with SPUDS to turn the fast buck. And the winning formula worked from their beginning right up to (...) (23 years ago, 22-Aug-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LEGO in Washington Post —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | | In lugnet.technic.bionicle, Harvey Henkelman writes: Remember Rocky III? Rocky had lost his edge and got his clock (...) Oh, great work Harvey...now I'll have *that* stupid song in my head for the rest of the day...thank you *so* very much... 8?P (...) (23 years ago, 22-Aug-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | |
